Bundle 2+ services and save up to 25%. Build Your Bundle → Bundle 2+ services, save up to 25% →
Case StudyLead GenerationMeta Ads Management

Texas Insurance Broker Slashes Lead Costs From $63 to $16 With Reverse Marketing

When platform changes hit the insurance industry and cost per lead spiked across the board, The Healthy Insurance Dude needed a smarter way to generate leads, not just a cheaper one. Here's how we rebuilt the strategy and cut costs 75% without sacrificing quality.

$63Starting Cost Per Lead
$21CPL After 90 Days
$16CPL by Open Enrollment
75%Lead Cost Reduction
The Healthy Insurance Dude lead generation cost reduction results
ClientThe Healthy Insurance Dude
IndustryHealth, Life & Retirement Insurance
LocationHurst, TX
ServicesMeta Ads, Lead Strategy, Funnel Qualification
Client Background

A Texas Insurance Brokerage Built Around Simplicity, Affordability, and Real People

The Healthy Insurance Dude isn't your typical insurance agency. Based in Hurst, Texas, and founded by Perry Lunsford, HID built its brand around the belief that quality health coverage shouldn't require a law degree to understand or a second mortgage to afford. The team's faces are literally on the website: the anti-corporate option in a space known for confusion and fine print.

They serve individuals, 1099 contractors, and small business owners with underwritten PPOs, ACA plans, group coverage, life insurance, and retirement planning. The philosophy running through all of it: make insurance simple, affordable, and human.

For a business that runs on consistent lead flow, cost per lead isn't just a metric. It's the number that decides whether the whole operation stays viable. When that number spiked, fixing it wasn't optional.

The Challenge

Platform Changes Pushed Insurance Leads Into a Category Nobody Planned For

In 2024, Meta moved insurance offers into a restricted advertising category. Targeting narrowed, delivery got less efficient, and cost per lead climbed industry-wide. For HID it hit roughly $63, and with open enrollment approaching, the window to fix it was closing. The challenge wasn't just lowering costs: cheaper leads that don't convert are worse than expensive leads that do.

1

Restricted Targeting

Platform changes limited the audience parameters that had kept lead costs manageable, forcing a different approach to reach the right people.

2

Unqualified Submissions

Without qualification steps in the funnel, form fills came from people who weren't serious buyers, dragging cost per lead up and conversion down.

3

Campaigns Built for a Different Era

The account structure that worked before the restrictions wasn't designed for the new platform reality, and patching it wasn't going to be enough.

Our Approach

Stop Fighting the Platform. Rebuild Around It.

The mistake most advertisers make when platform rules change is forcing the old tactics to work in a new environment. That gets expensive and slow. The faster path is accepting the new constraints and rebuilding the strategy to perform within them, the same approach behind our Meta ads management plans.

Full Account Audit

Before touching a campaign, we audited structure, targeting, creative performance, and lead flow. It wasn't one problem, it was a collection of gaps.

Rebuilt for the Restricted Category

The campaign architecture was rebuilt from scratch around the new category rules, reaching high-intent prospects without fighting the delivery system.

Behavioral & Contextual Targeting

Tighter audiences found through behavioral signals: fewer wasted impressions and a higher percentage of form fills worth following up on.

Qualification Before the Form

Steps that discourage casual browsers without blocking serious buyers, bringing unqualified submissions down and lead quality up.

Behavior-Based Optimization

Volume is a vanity metric if leads do not convert. We tracked lead behavior across 90 days and optimized for outcomes.

The Reverse Approach

Instead of pushing volume to a broad audience, the campaign worked harder at the qualification stage: fewer, better leads.

The Results

$63 to $16. A 75% Reduction With Sustained Volume.

After 90 days of rebuilding and optimization, cost per lead dropped to $21. As open enrollment arrived and the account matured, it fell to $16. The leads kept coming, the quality held, and the business got a cost structure it could actually build on.

$63Starting Cost Per Lead
$0CPL After 90 Days
$0CPL by Open Enrollment
What Made It Work

The Platform Changed. The Strategy Changed With It.

Audit Before You Adjust

Most advertisers respond to rising costs by tweaking bids or swapping creatives. The real issue was structural, and the audit proved it before a single change was made.

Qualify Before the Form

A form with no friction gets submissions with no intent. Qualification steps filtered out browsers and left buyers, so every lead was worth more.

Optimize for Behavior, Not Volume

The metric that matters isn't how many people filled out a form. It's how many are worth calling.

Cheap leads that don't convert aren't a win. The goal was lower cost and better quality, and that took a rebuild, not a bid tweak.

Ready to Fix Your Lead Costs?

Cost per lead is the number that decides whether a lead generation business stays viable. Book a free 30-minute strategy call and we'll show you where your account is leaking spend.

Back to All Case Studies

Join Our VIP List

Get special offers, marketing news, and trends straight to your inbox.

Join Our VIP List
Lotiva

Marketing, websites, and software built to grow your business. Based in Lewisville, Texas, serving clients nationwide.

Rated 5 stars on Google

Contact

Copyright © 2026 Lotiva. All rights reserved.